serene: mailbox (Default)
serene ([personal profile] serene) wrote2008-04-21 04:56 pm

(no subject)

So I followed a link in a locked post to the Open-source Boob Project, and here's how my thinking went:

1) Wonder if I should post to my friendslist "Yes, you may".

2) Well, but should I friends-lock it?

3) Well, but then I should really remove anyone from my friendslist that I don't want touching my boobs.

4) Well, no, because I can say no to them. But wouldn't it be funny to just post an open post saying "If I drop you from my friendslist in the next day or so, it's because I don't want you touching my boobs"?

Anyway, Yes, you can. Ask, that is. I'm likely to say "You can touch my boobs; it's no big deal."

Re: the Open-source Boob Project

[identity profile] cakmpls.livejournal.com 2008-04-22 02:05 pm (UTC)(link)
women touching women non-sexually

I'm just curious--feel free not to answer--but why do you presume that all of the woman-touching-woman was non-sexual?
ext_481: origami crane (Default)

Re: the Open-source Boob Project

[identity profile] pir-anha.livejournal.com 2008-04-22 07:37 pm (UTC)(link)
i don't presume it. that's how he described it. i am taking issue with his post and his idea of this "project" much more so than with the event in question; i wasn't there.

Re: the Open-source Boob Project

[identity profile] cakmpls.livejournal.com 2008-04-23 12:47 pm (UTC)(link)
I agree that the event itself and the idea of a "project" should be taken separately, and from his later posting, it appears that he has also come around to that.

I missed his describing the women touching women as non-sexual; how, one wonders, would he know?