Okay, lisa, you're distracting me
Feb. 28th, 2002 06:55 amWell, you *always* distract me. Radiant beauty and wit and all, but now it's gone too far.
But I didn't like that one much (though I was surprised at the answer; I call my wife Lovey), so I did this one:
<td>
<td>
The Castaway Quiz deems me: |
|
![]() | You radiate wholesome goodness. This drives men wild. Sure Ginger may get all the attention at first, but in the end, it's you they really want. |
But I didn't like that one much (though I was surprised at the answer; I call my wife Lovey), so I did this one:

no subject
Date: 2002-02-28 07:38 am (UTC)good grief. y'all are trying to make me <blush> aren't you?
keep this up and i'll start telling people that you're *nice*.
no subject
Date: 2002-02-28 07:48 am (UTC)Besides, if you tell people I'm nice, I'll -- I'll -- well, I'll think of something *really* mean to do to you. Meaner than flirting and flattering, I guarantee you *that*! *roarrrrr*
no subject
Date: 2002-02-28 07:59 am (UTC)fine. you're a bigmeanie. not only that, you're a BigMeanie. now will you still flirt with me?
<flutters eyelashes>
no subject
Date: 2002-02-28 08:06 am (UTC)I never. *You* said that.
Hard-- to-- flirt. So-- out-- of-- breath-- *faint* *thud*
no subject
Date: 2002-02-28 08:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-02-28 08:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-02-28 09:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-02-28 08:52 am (UTC)at any rate:
>I never. *You* said that.
well you said "duh." but the ominosity quiz said it first!
>Hard-- to-- flirt. So-- out-- of-- breath-- *faint* *thud*
oops. may i help you to this capacious chaise longue? and pat your temples with this handkerchief dipped in witch hazel since i'm allergic to eau de cologne?
no subject
Date: 2002-02-28 09:11 am (UTC)The former. Am I the only one wishing LJ quoted like Usenet?
Now yer talking. Thank you, sweet woman. (I'm allergic, too.)
no subject
Date: 2002-02-28 09:17 am (UTC)The (rough) convention around here seems to be to cute and paste, then to surround the quoted material with <cite> </cite> pairs, as above.
no subject
Date: 2002-02-28 09:19 am (UTC)The (rough) convention around here seems to be to cute and paste, then to surround the quoted material with pairs, as above.
no subject
Date: 2002-02-28 09:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-02-28 09:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-02-28 10:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-02-28 10:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-02-28 10:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-02-28 10:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-02-28 09:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-02-28 09:55 am (UTC)