Links
Page Summary
supergee.livejournal.com - (no subject)
semperfiona - (no subject)
redbird - (no subject)
slinkr.livejournal.com - (no subject)
wispfox.livejournal.com - (no subject)
futabachan.livejournal.com - (no subject)
pir-anha.livejournal.com - lite my way!
kightp.livejournal.com - (no subject)
malte.livejournal.com - (no subject)
dakiwiboid.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Lettuce for Crossroads by
- Resources: P r o l o g u e
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2003-06-13 11:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-17 08:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-13 11:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-17 08:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-13 11:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-17 08:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-13 11:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-15 08:44 am (UTC)I'm curious
Date: 2003-06-15 09:23 am (UTC)Not that I assume you're one of those people who do that, just curious.
Re: I'm curious
Date: 2003-06-15 06:35 pm (UTC)But that's sort of beside the point. I don't really expect to be treated respectfully by anyone who goes around telling people that God hates them (and being a Jewish lesbian makes me a potential target for that kind of bigotry regardless of whether or not I believe in God). I expect better than that from Serene because we're friends despite our significant differences on matters of theology.
I think that if the initial announcement had included a brief disclaimer of some sort then I would have found it easier to say "hey, good luck with your new project" instead of taking offense.
Re: I'm curious
Date: 2003-06-15 09:16 pm (UTC)If it helps any, I wrote the bit about loonys, not serene.
...if the initial announcement had included a brief disclaimer of some sort...
Such as what? A warning that the material behind the link may be offensive to some?
Re: I'm curious
Date: 2003-06-16 04:04 am (UTC)But like I said, some of the comments in this thread (yours in particular) enabled me to view the site in a context other than "my atheist friend thinks that all non-atheists are nuts." If I think about it in terms of you folks needing safe space for your beliefs or lack thereof, I can easily manage not to take it personally. But my initial reaction didn't occur in that context, which is probably some combination of my fault and a function of how it was introduced.
Re: I'm curious
Date: 2003-06-17 07:36 am (UTC)[The following sounds snarky to me upon re-reading it, but please take my word for the fact that I'm not feeling snarky, just wanting to be clarity-girl with regards to how I feel in all this:]
I have kept my poking at religion and rabid theists to a minimum in public space, only being explicit about it in my own journal, and both my and the church's website, both of which are specifically atheist space, complete with big ol' banners that say "A Church Without God", in case anyone is unclear on what they're about to read. I haven't gone to theists' sites and told them they're disrespecting me when they say that I need to believe in $DEITY to be happy/saved/enlightened, and I will confess that I'm not going to expend much apologetic energy towards people who are upset with me for what I've put in my space. (All of which is not to say I'm not happy to answer concerns, because I am, or that my opinions become unassailable when they're in "my space," because they don't.)
Re: I'm curious
Date: 2003-06-17 07:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-13 12:00 pm (UTC)'competitor'
I like that option. :)
no subject
Date: 2003-06-17 08:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-13 12:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-17 08:43 am (UTC)lite my way!
Date: 2003-06-13 12:56 pm (UTC)Re: lite my way!
Date: 2003-06-17 08:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-13 01:05 pm (UTC)(Nice work on the site, too, you guys!)
no subject
Date: 2003-06-17 08:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-13 01:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-14 07:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-14 09:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-14 04:57 pm (UTC)Feel free to mentally substitute mosque, temple, circle, synagogue, sweat lodge, forest glade, UFO landing site, cathedral or whatever for church as appropriate to your situation.
--Rev James Huber
no subject
Date: 2003-06-15 01:03 am (UTC)But seriously, I think if you really want to be a church without god and not a christian church without god, you might want to look a bit more closely at traaditions you can borrow from other religions. Otherwise it's going to look very much like you think that it's them that are the real loony cults (see
no subject
Date: 2003-06-15 09:50 am (UTC)If you'd like to add expertise in Islam or whatever, then by all means join.
It's very important to realize that the church is not an attempt to reach out to everybody. Unitarian Universalism already does a fine job of that.
ChurchLite is an attempt to reach out to other people who are like us, people who (for example) find UU too WooWoo for their taste, and who think James Randi deserves some sort of freakin' medal.
We do think most people are loony. We get along with them fine most of the time, but we need a place where we can sing it out loud occasionally.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-17 07:43 am (UTC)Who said we do? "Church" is a christian concept. In my country, protestant christianity is the dominant paradigm. I have fun poking at the dominant paradigm, especially because I'm soaking in it.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-13 03:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-17 08:23 am (UTC)