(no subject)
Dec. 28th, 2009 11:33 pmSo apparently, if one sees Avatar and thinks it's racist and ablist, one is looking for racism/ablism. Also, the race of the actors is a deliberate metaphor, so it can't possibly be racism.
Discuss.
(And on top of that, if one evaluates a good number of people's reviews and decide the work is problematic (*waves at vito*), the person is completely misinformed, shouldn't enter discussions about this, and the only way they're worth listening to is if they go watch the movie. Sorry. It didn't work with "The Passion of the Christ", and it's not working now. Cameron isn't getting a cent from me, no matter how many of my friends think I'm facile for saying so.)
Discuss.
(And on top of that, if one evaluates a good number of people's reviews and decide the work is problematic (*waves at vito*), the person is completely misinformed, shouldn't enter discussions about this, and the only way they're worth listening to is if they go watch the movie. Sorry. It didn't work with "The Passion of the Christ", and it's not working now. Cameron isn't getting a cent from me, no matter how many of my friends think I'm facile for saying so.)
no subject
Date: 2009-12-29 11:06 am (UTC)So yeah. I still more enjoyed it than didn't, because of the stunning effects, and the actual storyline wasn't too bad (although trite and cliched), but I frankly expect very little from SF movies. SF literature is something else.
So for those who are telling you that you're being a dog-in-the-manger about it, bugger them. It is problematic, and so much so that I was rolling my eyes during the movie, which is unusual for me. For me, it wasn't bad enough to walk out, but I would certainly skip the last third of the movie if I watched it again (after he and Native Shaman Lady shag but before he gets most of the goodies and becomes the Almighty Saviour of the Pathetic Natives).
no subject
Date: 2009-12-29 11:14 am (UTC)Natives of the Planet Male in Star System Pale
Date: 2009-12-29 04:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-29 06:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-29 04:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-29 06:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-29 07:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-29 04:22 pm (UTC)I love how the "you're looking for it" argument is supposed to invalidate any anti-oppression work anyone does (along the lines of "you think too much," another old favorite). Shouldn't we all be investigating oppression? Since when is that a bad thing?
no subject
Date: 2009-12-29 06:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-29 07:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-29 06:20 pm (UTC)I do look for racism/ablism in movies, because it helps me become more aware of racism/ablism in me and the rest of my life, and I think being aware of it is a good thing.
I'm not sure how the race of an actor can be a metaphor, deliberate or not. But metaphors can certainly be racist.
I tend not to enter into discussions about works I haven't seen or read (unless invited), but I certainly enter into metadiscussions about the discussions.
In this case, although I haven't seen the movie, I have seen the preview, and that is racist/ablist enough. I don't have to see the whole movie to know that's part of what's going on.
And the preview told me the whole plot of the movie because I've seen so many other "what these people need is a honky named Marty Stu" movies and "a disabled person isn't a real person until they get a functioning body" movies, and those genres exist because of the racism/ablism in my society.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-29 06:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-29 07:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-29 07:48 pm (UTC)