Please, oh great universe that never listens to me anyway,
please-oh-please spare me from people who think it's funny to call people
pussies when they mean "sorry-ass weaklings."
And then get all condescending and pat you on the shoulder while they ask
you what they *should* say, dear.
"Kitty. Would that work? Kitty? How about wuss?"
"Listen. If you mean weakling, say weakling. Don't use misogynistic
language, especially not in the workplace."
Yeesh.
please-oh-please spare me from people who think it's funny to call people
pussies when they mean "sorry-ass weaklings."
And then get all condescending and pat you on the shoulder while they ask
you what they *should* say, dear.
"Kitty. Would that work? Kitty? How about wuss?"
"Listen. If you mean weakling, say weakling. Don't use misogynistic
language, especially not in the workplace."
Yeesh.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 05:02 pm (UTC)Words are for the Monkees
Date: 2005-11-30 05:10 pm (UTC)Oh, and the reason I'm on the fence about this one is that etymologically, pussy meant soft and rabbitlike way before it meant vagina. And when you are calling someone a pussy you are basically calling them soft and rabbitlike.
On the other hand though, pussy is supposed to mean soft in a pleasing way like a pussy willow is all soft instead of the harsh willow or a pussy cat is all snuggly unlike a non snuggly cat.
Re: Words are for the Monkees
Date: 2005-11-30 05:13 pm (UTC)Re: Words are for the Monkees
Date: 2005-11-30 05:25 pm (UTC)I'm kind of on the fence about this one but how come you never see (or I never see, I should say) anyone complain about someone being called a dick or a prick or a dickhead when they mean someone who is mean, indifferent, rude or unfeeling?
Then you've not been around me when someone has used the term.
Oh, and the reason I'm on the fence about this one is that etymologically, pussy meant soft and rabbitlike way before it meant vagina. And when you are calling someone a pussy you are basically calling them soft and rabbitlike.
No, you're calling them weak and woman-like, and unmanly. The problem with that is it has now come to mean what it means, and in the context of it being used as a pejorative, etymology doesn't mean a thing. It is, now, using the slang term for a female body part as a dysphemism to express derision.
Re: Words are for the Monkees
Date: 2005-11-30 05:28 pm (UTC)Re: Words are for the Monkees
Date: 2005-11-30 05:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 05:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 05:30 pm (UTC)Re: Words are for the Monkees
Date: 2005-11-30 05:34 pm (UTC)Misandric.
pussy meant soft and rabbitlike way before it meant vagina
http://www.idiocentrism.com/puss.htm
Re: Words are for the Monkees
Date: 2005-11-30 05:42 pm (UTC)In short, my insulting a man (if I were the sort to do that, and in general, I'm not) is not as bad as a man insulting me, especially if sexually derogatory terms are used, because my insult does not carry the force of social history and custom.
That social history and custom is that men are more powerful than I, because they're men. I am less important than they, because I'm a woman. And they have the social sanction to turn their insulting language to violence. Their verbal nastiness has threat and fear in it, because the society they live in gives them power over women. When they use "pussy" to mean "weakling" they are not using hyperbole. Women *are* weak(er) in this world we grew up in, and I feel an undercurrent of smug evil in the perpetuation of that mindset, even if it's meant to be a toothless jest.
This may seem like overreaction to some (chiefly, men who think I'm calling them misogynist when I point out that they are unthinkingly perpetuating a hurtful and mysoginistic language tic), but I don't see it as an overreaction (but then I wouldn't, would I?). I see it as a reasonable reaction to a genuine problem that needs addressing.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 05:45 pm (UTC)*giggle*
*hairtoss*
no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 05:45 pm (UTC)Re: Words are for the Monkees
Date: 2005-11-30 05:49 pm (UTC)I'm trying to get over using "fucking asshole."
no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 05:52 pm (UTC)Re: Words are for the Monkees
Date: 2005-11-30 05:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 05:53 pm (UTC)Hey, can you send me an email if you get this?
no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 05:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 05:56 pm (UTC)I thought it came from pussy as in pussy cat, you can say someone is a "real pussy cat" meaning a pushover and then I assumed it was shortened to pussy still keeping the weak as a kitten argument?
no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 05:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 06:15 pm (UTC)Re: Words are for the Monkees
Date: 2005-11-30 06:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 06:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 06:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 06:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 06:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 07:42 pm (UTC)Re: Words are for the Monkees
Date: 2005-11-30 07:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 07:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 07:47 pm (UTC)1984, from wussy (1960s), probably an alteration of pussy.
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=wuss
wuss
n. Slang
A person regarded as weak or timid and especially as unmanly: “Cats are for wusses, dog men say” (Laura Blumenfeld).
[Probably blend of wimp, and pussy1.]
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=wuss
no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 07:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 08:02 pm (UTC)says there's no evidence for that.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 09:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 11:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-01 12:16 am (UTC)I can understand a person being upset that the word has been "stolen" to mean girlie bits. I think it really sucks that the etymology could go either way (i.e.: "Girlie man" or "wimpy as a pussy cat"). Honestly, English needs a word for "contempt-worthy weakling" that doesn't have a double meaning like that.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-01 04:12 am (UTC)Such a pity that "Bush" has gender-specific connotations, too...
no subject
Date: 2005-12-01 11:53 am (UTC)*wipes coffee off monitor*
no subject
Date: 2005-12-09 02:09 am (UTC)